On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 16/04/16 20:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build against it because they do a >>> string comparison on the version (STRLESS vs VERSION_LESS) so 1.10 >>> appears too old, but it's an easy fix. >> >> Strange, as that particular comparison is in the >> FindTaglib-Extras.cmake only, so it should not cause problems with >> taglib itself. > > Right, there's no problem with taglib itself. It's just a heads up that > some revdeps have faulty version detection logic and fail to find 1.10.
Does that mean that these lines in FindTaglib.cmake are causing a problem to find version 1.10? if(NOT TAGLIB_MIN_VERSION) set(TAGLIB_MIN_VERSION "1.6") endif(NOT TAGLIB_MIN_VERSION) Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300)
