> 
> On May 9, 2026, at 8:58 PM, Aris via agora-discussion 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, May 9, 2026 at 5:07 PM Gregory Hayes via agora-discussion <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Fair argument, I guess "prohibit" is not the same thing as "prevent", so
>> the rules could be interpreted as preventing an action with no mechanism
>> without prohibiting it.
>> I do note that if Rule 2713's "as described in this rule" clause blocks
>> this, it also blocks scoring numbers from Agoran birthdays and welcome
>> packages.
>> - Galle
> 
> 
> I suspect that the rules do prevent you from doing this. But I think you
> might be missing a part of what ais523 is saying: even if the rules don't
> prevent you from doing something, that doesn't mean you can do it. A player
> can send a message saying "I teleport to the moon", and no rule prohibits
> such teleportation. That doesn't mean that the player is on the moon, which
> is likely fortunate for their well-being. There simply isn't any reason
> that action should work.
> 
> There's a precedent somewhere that there are some actions you can do by
> announcement even without the rules saying so, like celebrating. Saying "I
> celebrate x" is arguably enough to celebrate the thing, under the common
> language definition of celebrating, and no rule stops you from celebrating
> in this way. But I don't see how scoring a number is something you can just
> naturally do. And even if you could (say you invented a game where you
> could score a number by saying it, and thus scored points in that game by
> announcement), I don't think the rules would pay attention to it.
> 
> -Aris

No, I do understand that, I just don't think there's any textual support for 
the claim that mechanism-less actions are necessarily impossible in the rules. 
If they're impossible, that's a matter of Rule 217 interpretation, which makes 
Rule 2125 potentially relevant. I was just saying that technically that 
interpretation doesn't involve PROHIBITING unregulated actions so much as 
preventing them, or interpreting them as not being possible to begin with.

- Galle

Reply via email to