On 3/19/26 23:35, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Title: Whoa there, back it up
> Author: Janet
> Coauthors:
> Adoption index: 3.0
Oops, got a bit hasty:
In total, this is meant to fully address contracts attempting to cause
problems with ambiguity in what they allow with assets.
> Amend Rule 2576 ("Ownership") by replacing the paragraph beginning "An
> asset CANNOT be gained by or transferred to an entity" with the
> following paragraph:
>
> {
>
> An asset can be owned by an entity if and only if:
>
> * the backing document specifies that that entity can own it; or
> * the backing document, other than this paragraph, is entirely silent
> on what entities can own it, and that entity is Agora, a player, or
> a contract.
>
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, an asset CANNOT be gained by or
> transferred to an entity unless that entity can own it.
>
> }
This should also say "clearly and unambiguously specifies". It's meant
to clear up what is meant by "otherwise" in the existing paragraph and
add a missing RttCN clause.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor
