On 11/12/25 12:24 AM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
I'll admit that's fair for 9259. I was in a hurry to do *something* after seeing the numbers (and I had limited time for Agora that day, so I wrote those proposals rather quickly). The exponential growth is coming to a head *right now*, and while the balance point may need tweaking, I also think, for a few reasons, that the proposal is better than just allowing players to continue accumulating the equivalent of exponentially more radiance wins. (I recognize we are both self-interested here, and this is potentially somewhat motivated reasoning on my part, but I don't think that's most of it.)
An alternative would be to just remove the ability to convert spendies into radiance.
And, regardless, I don't think that's a fair characterization of 9260. It's a rebalancing, certainly, but it would come with sufficient notice for people to plan around, and it would apply equally as well to anyone else trying to start playing the subgame.
I don't follow. There are already at least five players with more than 16 hectares, and those are investments that can't be reversed at this point.
-- Mischief Collar, Collector, Prime Minister Hat: steampunk hat
