I support this.
On November 3, 2025 8:02:07 AM PST, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-official <[email protected]> wrote: >EarlyRetirement judged CFJ 4125 a little over a week ago [1], but >several other people presented additional arguments after the fact, both >in support of the original judgement [2,3] and against it [4,5,6]. At >least two of these requested a Motion for Reconsideration [4,6], but the >deadline to file one has now passed. > >Whether or not the original judgement stands, I contend it would be >beneficial - to public confidence in the judicial system; to future >judges who must investigate precedent; and to nomic recordkeepors and >historians - for the case's judgement to be amended to consider these >additional arguments. Thus, I intend, with 3 support, to enter the >judgement of CFJ 4125 into Moot. > >~qenya > >[1] >https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2025-October/054739.html > >[2] >https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2025-October/065039.html > >[3] >https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2025-October/054743.html > >[4] >https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2025-October/065037.html > >[5] >https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2025-October/065038.html > >[6] >https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2025-October/065047.html >
