I vote as follows, respective to the listed order of the proposals:
FOR
FOR
AGAINST

On November 2, 2025 10:40:39 PM PST, Cosmo via agora-official 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>=================
>PROMOTOR'S REPORT
>=================
>
>
>I initiate a referendum on each of the following proposals, removing
>them from the proposal pool. For each referendum the vote collector is the
>Assessor, the quorum is 3, the adoption index is that of the associated
>proposal, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR
>and AGAINST. (PRESENT and conditional votes are also both valid options.)
>
>ID         Author         AI     Name
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>9254*      Janet+         3.0    Administrative Publication Act
>9255*      Janet          3.0    It's personal
>9256~      Murphy         1.0    No more apathetic apathy
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>The proposal pool contains the following proposals (self-ratifying):
>Author         AI     Name
>------------------------------------------------------
>4st+           1.0 Truly Indestructible? 
>------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>Legend:
>NNNN*: Democratic proposal
>NNNN~: Ordinary proposal
>NAME+: Coauthors listed below
>
>The full text of all above mentioned proposals is listed below.
>
>
>==========
>ID 9254
>Administrative Publication Act (AI=3.0)
>author: Janet
>coauthors: kiako
>
>
>Amend Rule 2651 ("The Election Cycle") by, as a single amendment
>(failing as a whole if any step fails):
>
>* Replacing "the ADoP CAN and SHALL publish a Notice of Election" with
>"the ADoP CAN by announcement and SHALL issue a Notice of Election".
>
>* Replacing "Such a notice initiates" with "Doing so initiates".
>
>* Replacing "if there are fewer than 2 term-limited offices, the ADoP
>MUST instead list all of them" with "or, if there are fewer than 2 such
>offices, all of them".
>
>[The last part is a drive-by fix.]
>
>
>Amend Rule 2555 ("Blots") by replacing "Once a quarter, the Referee CAN
>(and SHALL during its first Eastman week) publish a Notice of Clemency"
>with "Once per quarter, the Referee CAN by announcement (and SHALL
>during its first Eastman week) issue a Notice of Clemency".
>
>Amend Rule 2656 ("Radiance") by replacing "Once a quarter, the
>Illuminator CAN (and SHALL during its first Eastman week) publish a
>Notice of Diminution" with "Once per quarter, the Illuminator CAN by
>announcement (and SHALL during its first Eastman week) issue a Notice of
>Diminution".
>
>[I have always been annoyed by using "CAN publish" as an attempt to
>authorize an action. To "publish" is already defined, and we have a
>perfectly method for actions taken by sending a message: "by
>announcement". I would argue "This is a Notice of X." continues to work
>under this standard, since one no longer has to explicitly announce that
>e performs a "by announcement" action in order to take it, and saying
>that clearly sets forth intent to take the action of "issuing" the Notice.]
>
>
>If, immediately prior to this proposal taking effect (and under the
>ruleset then in effect), the ADoP had published a Notice of Election in
>the current quarter, any duty for em to issue a Notice of Election in
>the current quarter is discharged.
>
>If, immediately prior to this proposal taking effect (and under the
>ruleset then in effect), the Referee had published a Notice of
>Clemency in the current quarter, any duty for em to issue a Notice of
>Clemency in the current quarter is discharged.
>
>If, immediately prior to this proposal taking effect (and under the
>ruleset then in effect), the Illuminator had published a Notice of
>Diminution in the current quarter, any duty for em to issue a Notice of
>Diminution in the current quarter is discharged.
>
>[Clarify that this proposal does not impose any additional duties in the
>current quarter.]
>
>
>Amend Rule 869 ("How to Join and Leave Agora") by replacing the text "by
>publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly" with "by sending
>a public message that indicates reasonably clearly".
>
>[The "message" part of this requirement is already included in the
>definition of "publish".]
>
>
>Amend Rule 2463 ("Motion of No Confidence") to read as follows:
>
>{
>
>Any player CAN, with Agoran consent, cause the office of Prime Minister
>to become vacant, provided that the message in which e does so contains
>the string "MOTION OF NO CONFIDENCE" in its subject line. Motions of no
>confidence SHOULD be used whenever Agorans want to shake things up,
>rather than as a personal judgement of the Prime Minister.
>
>}
>
>[Remove the double method ("with Agoran consent" and "by publishing
>[...]") by phrasing it as a condition instead. Also, fix a typo
>("missing "be" after "SHOULD").]
>
>
>
>
>==========
>ID 9255
>It's personal (AI=3.0)
>author: Janet
>coauthors:
>
>
>Amend Rule 2556 ("Penalties") by replacing the text "voting strength of
>a player" with the text "voting strength of a person".
>
>[Fix a bug discovered during Agoran't that lets a person dodge a
>Blot-based voting strength penalty by deregistering.]
>
>
>
>
>==========
>ID 9256
>No more apathetic apathy (AI=1.0)
>author: Murphy
>coauthors:
>
>
>Amend Rule 2465 (Victory by Apathy) by appending this text:
>
>      Announcing intent to Declare Apathy is the Class 5 Infraction of
>      Goldbricking, but this infraction is automatically forgiven if its
>      sponsor successfully Declares Apathy on the basis of that intent,
>      and SHOULD be forgiven if its sponsor demonstrates that e
>      reasonably expected to be able to do so (e.g. by exploiting a bug
>      in the rules governing tabled actions, or privately bribing
>      players not specified to win, but not simply by announcing intent
>      and hoping that no other players checked e-mail for a few days).
>
>==========
>Truly Indestructible? (AI=1.0)
>author: 4st
>coauthors: kiako, Janet
>
>Amend Rule 2695 "The Veblen" by appending:
>{
>If the Veblen does not exist, any player CAN,
>by announcement, Become All Powerful. When e
>does so, e wins the game, and the Veblen is
>created in eir possession. A player who wins
>in this fashion SHOULD submit a proposal to
>prevent the destruction from arising again.
>}
>
>-- 
>Cosmo
>Promotor

Reply via email to