Oopsie, was confused. I think you're right, ais523. Sorry.

On November 2, 2025 3:38:44 PM PST, Automaticat via agora-discussion 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Although I would support forgiveness, that is certainly a noting.
>
>On November 2, 2025 3:25:08 PM PST, ais523 via agora-discussion 
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>On Wed, 2025-10-29 at 10:26 -0300, juan via agora-official wrote:
>>> 4st nomic via agora-official [2025-10-28 13:31]:
>>> > […]
>>> > PLACE  NAME [0]  PREVIOUS  CHANGE [1]  RADIANCE
>>> > -----  --------  --------  ----------  --------
>>> > 1st    JWN       31      -16           15
>>> > 2nd    AIS       17        -9            8
>>> > 3rd    JNT       3            -2         1
>>> >         MUR       3            -2         1
>>> > 5th    COS       2            -1         1
>>> >         JPR       2               -1      1
>>> >         KIA       2              -1       1
>>> > 8th    BEN       1            -1         0
>>> > 
>>> >         Total     61        -33        28
>>> 
>>> First time I see a Making My Eyes Bleed.
>>
>>I'm not going to treat this as an official noting of an infraction
>>because it doesn't use the word "note", which is in quotes in the rule,
>>implying that it might be a different action from a natural-language
>>noting that an infraction has occurred and one that has to be triggered
>>intentionally.
>>
>>If anyone disagrees, please CFJ.
>>
>>-- 
>>ais523
>>Referee

Reply via email to