Although I would support forgiveness, that is certainly a noting.
On November 2, 2025 3:25:08 PM PST, ais523 via agora-discussion <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, 2025-10-29 at 10:26 -0300, juan via agora-official wrote: >> 4st nomic via agora-official [2025-10-28 13:31]: >> > […] >> > PLACE NAME [0] PREVIOUS CHANGE [1] RADIANCE >> > ----- -------- -------- ---------- -------- >> > 1st JWN 31 -16 15 >> > 2nd AIS 17 -9 8 >> > 3rd JNT 3 -2 1 >> > MUR 3 -2 1 >> > 5th COS 2 -1 1 >> > JPR 2 -1 1 >> > KIA 2 -1 1 >> > 8th BEN 1 -1 0 >> > >> > Total 61 -33 28 >> >> First time I see a Making My Eyes Bleed. > >I'm not going to treat this as an official noting of an infraction >because it doesn't use the word "note", which is in quotes in the rule, >implying that it might be a different action from a natural-language >noting that an infraction has occurred and one that has to be triggered >intentionally. > >If anyone disagrees, please CFJ. > >-- >ais523 >Referee
