> (b) the title
> being "(AI=1.0)" and no AI being specified that attempt fails to meet
> the "by announcement standard"?
>
Arguments as to why this interpretation does create a valid proposal:
Rule 2350 states that stating an AI is optional, and Rule 1950 gives
proposals a default AI of 1, if one isn't specified.
Evidence:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 1950/39 (Power=3)
Decisions with Adoption Indices
Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran
decisions and proposals, secured at power 2. For decisions, the
possible values are "none" (default) or integral multiples of 0.1
from 1.0 to 9.9. For proposals, the possible values are integral
multiples of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9 (default 1.0).
The adoption index of a referendum CANNOT be set or changed to
"none" or to a value less than that of its associated proposal. If
a referendum ever has an adoption index of "none" or an adoption
index less than that of its associated proposal, it is immediately
set to the adoption index of the associated proposal.
Adoption index is an essential parameter of an Agoran decision if
that decision has an adoption index.
For any Agoran decision with a non-"none" adoption index, the
voting method is AI-majority.
>
