I suppose one could argue that either A: The proposal failed because it specified no adoption index, the title is "(AI=1.0)". B: That it failed because it specified no title (Or that it simply has no title if one is not required). C: That it's title is "" and then adoption index is stored in the same line, but is not the title. D: That being the title does not preclude a section from specifying another field, so the title is "(AI=1.0)" and the AI is 1.0.
On October 29, 2025 10:38:07 AM PDT, 4st nomic via agora-discussion <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 10:34 AM 4st nomic via agora-business ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> HOT NEW BAD IDEA JUST DROPPED >> >> I submit the following proposal: >> { >> Title: (AI=1.0) >> Author: 4st >> coauthors: kiako, Janet >> >> Amend Rule 2695 "The Veblen" by appending: >> { >> If the Veblen does not exist, any player CAN, >> by announcement, Become All Powerful. When e >> does so, e wins the game, and the Veblen is >> created in eir possession. A player who wins >> in this fashion SHOULD submit a proposal to >> prevent the destruction from arising again. >> } >> } >> >> >> -- >> 4ˢᵗ >> wearing Jester's Cap >> Uncertified Bad Idea Generator > >Sorry Promotor. I've put in an ambiguous title. HAVE FUN! > >-- >4ˢᵗ >wearing Jester's Cap >Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
