On Sun, 2025-09-28 at 15:25 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 9/28/25 14:46, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > > (Of course, there's nothing for the Referee to do here in any case, > > because no actual infraction was committed and thus there is nothing to > > note – the rule is that the reasoning behind the incorrect information > > must be explained in the intent, and there's no rule requiring it to > > also be specified in the resolution.) > > > Isn't there? R2202 says "SHALL NOT knowingly use or announce intent to > use Ratification Without Objection [...]", and I would assume one "uses" > RWO when resolving the intent.
The rule criminalises: a) announcing intent to RWO incorrectness without explaining it; b) RWOing incorrectness, unless the intent explained it. So there are indeed two times at which the crime can happen, but both of them require an explanation in the intent; neither of them requires an explanation with the resolution. -- ais523
