On 9/28/25 15:38, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, 2025-09-28 at 15:25 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >> On 9/28/25 14:46, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: >>> (Of course, there's nothing for the Referee to do here in any case, >>> because no actual infraction was committed and thus there is nothing to >>> note – the rule is that the reasoning behind the incorrect information >>> must be explained in the intent, and there's no rule requiring it to >>> also be specified in the resolution.) >> >> Isn't there? R2202 says "SHALL NOT knowingly use or announce intent to >> use Ratification Without Objection [...]", and I would assume one "uses" >> RWO when resolving the intent. > The rule criminalises: > > a) announcing intent to RWO incorrectness without explaining it; > b) RWOing incorrectness, unless the intent explained it. > > So there are indeed two times at which the crime can happen, but both > of them require an explanation in the intent; neither of them requires > an explanation with the resolution. >
Ah! Yep, you're right. Sorry. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
