On Sun, 2025-08-24 at 13:15 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: > [My recordkeeping software currently doesn't check "did this player > already succumb this month", though I checked the database and didn't > find any oversights that weren't already corrected. I could get around > to implementing a check, or alternatively I could make it only matter > if/when someone actually bothers to note an infraction.]
I guess the interesting question here is: how worthwhile do people consider it to punish things like late reports? So far I've been using a policy of not really caring about infractions unless someone is concerned enough to note them, and people generally haven't been noting them. It does perhaps make sense to note the infractions only if someone is actually inconvenienced (i.e. if someone tries to look up a report because they need the information, and can't find it, they note it then) – but perhaps if we have a culture of not noting, that may cause players to fail to note even when they are inconvenienced, due to not wanting to rock the boat. Right now, noting is pretty easy and doesn't really create work for anyone other than me, but it doesn't seem to be actually happening in practice (even in cases where a potential infraction has been discussed). -- ais523 Referee
