On 8/11/25 2:45 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 8/10/25 13:11, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
The events
A... lot of these events seem like things we shouldn't want to
incentivize, even if they aren't harmful in and of themselves.
M a player other than you submits a Cantus Cygneus
Cantus Cygneus is an important release valve; incentivizing using it
seems like it would diminish the importance of the message it sends.
Fair enough -- deleted.
D right now, you are the Absurdor
D right now, you are the ADoP
D right now, you are the Arbitor
D right now, you are the Archivist
D right now, you are the Assessor
D right now, you are the Collar
D right now, you are the Collector
D right now, you are the Distributor
D right now, you are the Herald
D right now, you are the Illuminator
D right now, you are the Notary
D right now, you are the Prime Minister
D right now, you are the Promotor
D right now, you are the Referee
D right now, you are the Registrar
D right now, you are the Rulekeepor
D right now, you are the Speaker
D right now, you are the Spendor
D right now, you are the Tailor
D right now, you are the Webmastor
Some of those offices (e.g. Arbitor, Distributor) are important to core
gameplay, and incentivizing people who might not be able to commit to
running them to hold them could lead to problems. A bit more
selfisnly, I am very attached to the offices I hold, and I am proud of
holding them continuously; it would be *very* frustrating to me for that
to be interrupted for someone to gain gameplay advantage (as opposed to,
e.g., my doing a bad job with them).
Any concerns with replacing them all with a single:
E right now, you hold at least one office
which seems like a useful thing to incentivize?
--
Mischief
Collar, Collector, Illuminator, Notary, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
