Dammit... My plan almost worked.
--
juniper

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025, 07:49 Edward Murphy via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> Juniper wrote:
>
> > I've forgotten where it is, but there's a rule somewhere about lying
> that I
> > hoped to enact here... Oh well.
>
> Rule 2471/4 (Power=1)
> No Faking
>
>        A person SHALL NOT make a public statement that is a lie.
>
>        A public statement is falsy if any of the following was true at
>        the time of publication:
>        * The statement was not true and the author knew or should have
>          known that it was not true.
>        * The author did not believe the statement to be true.
>
>        A public statement is a lie if it is falsy and any of the
>        following is true:
>        * The author made the statement with intent to mislead.
>        * The author, in the same message, declared the statement to be
>          made "under penalty of No Faking" (or similar).
>
>        For the purposes of this rule, an attempt to perform an action by
>        publishing certain text constitutes an implicit statement that the
>        action was EFFECTIVE.
>
>        Merely quoting a statement or attempt does not constitute making
>        it for the purposes of this rule. Any disclaimer, conditional
>        clause, or other qualifier attached to a statement or attempt
>        constitutes part of the statement or attempt for the purposes of
>        this rule; the truth or falsity of the whole is what is
>        significant.
>
>        The above notwithstanding, a formal announcement of intent is
>        never a lie.
>
> --
> [ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
>
>

Reply via email to