On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 11:15 +0000, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > I'd like to fix this situation, but am not sure what the best fix would > be. Some possibilities: > > * list investigated infractions, and do not specifically list > infractions that were noted but not investigated; > * list investigated infractions, plus attempts to note an infraction > (regardless of whether or not those attempts were successful); > * allow attempts to note actions/inactions/attempted actions to > succeed even if the noted occurrence is not an infraction, and have > the Referee's report report on such notings, but with such a noting > having no other consequence > > There might be other possibilities too! Does anyone have suggestions on > the best way to do it? >
Personally, I liked the way this worked under the previous (I think) iteration of the criminal justice system, where noting (then finger- pointing) created a duty on the investigator to determine whether an infraction actually occurred, even if the answer was "no". That seems far more intuitive to me than the current system: it is entirely unambiguous whether or not the investigator has to do something. ~qenya
