On 8/26/24 4:40 PM, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
On 8/25/24 12:13 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
I judge CFJ 4089 TRUE, per the arguments below. The relevant section
of proposal 9136 had its full intended effect.
Does this raise some uncertainty about any prior rule changes that we
originally thought failed? The ruleset was last ratified 2023-12-31 so
at least it's a somewhat limited problem.
(Also, to be clear, I found this a convincing argument -- my starting
position was FALSE -- so this isn't a criticism of the judgement itself.)
Okay, flipping back through the Rulekeepor's notes this year, P9136 was
the only edge case I saw. Others were clear failures -- such as a rule
that didn't exist at all -- or covered by another CFJ. One less concern
hanging out there!
(Also, kudos to Janet for eir diligent notes.)
--
Mischief
Collector
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: alive
Bang holdings: 1
