Sure, but duty is not the term used in the deputisation rule. On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:11 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 7/24/24 00:08, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > > I'm confused. What do you mean? > > > > 2) It would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform the action, > > other than by deputisation, if e held the office. > > You said it was not possible to appoint snail to Speaker. > > > > 5) A time limit by which the rules require the action to be > > performed has expired. > > The action in question is appointing Mischief, it is not expired. > > > > Is there some sort of history about "action type" or something that is > > implied? It does not say "duty" or "ability" here? > > > The only action authorized by R103 is to appoint a Laureled player to > Speaker (not a player who just won, a player who is Laureled). The > condition of being Laureled is evaluated continuously. Thus, R103 only > authorizes the appointment of a currently-Laureled player (whenever the > appointment is made). Right now, that's just Mischief. > > Similarly, the duty is to appoint a Laureled player, and that was is > what jimmy has failed to do for a time meeting the deputisation > requirements. > > -- > Janet Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > -- 4ˢᵗ wearing Jester's Cap Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
