On 7/24/24 00:08, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > I'm confused. What do you mean? > > 2) It would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform the action, > other than by deputisation, if e held the office. > You said it was not possible to appoint snail to Speaker. > > 5) A time limit by which the rules require the action to be > performed has expired. > The action in question is appointing Mischief, it is not expired. > > Is there some sort of history about "action type" or something that is > implied? It does not say "duty" or "ability" here?
The only action authorized by R103 is to appoint a Laureled player to Speaker (not a player who just won, a player who is Laureled). The condition of being Laureled is evaluated continuously. Thus, R103 only authorizes the appointment of a currently-Laureled player (whenever the appointment is made). Right now, that's just Mischief. Similarly, the duty is to appoint a Laureled player, and that was is what jimmy has failed to do for a time meeting the deputisation requirements. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
