Fwiw, Imo, that doesn't change anything other than how the rulekeepor reports it and anything else, the single amendment has two parts one of which applies and appends something and another which also applies yet changes nothing because the language is not found to replace.
-- 4st putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile On Sun, Jul 14, 2024, 11:30 AM Mischief via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 7/13/24 11:25 PM, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote: > > > Cfj: the appended paragraph exists in the new rule. > > Arguments FOR: the previous judgement Janet referenced. I think it makes > > sense and applies (at least, the way Janet summarized the argument). > > Also, AND says do as much as is possible. Eg "I intend to declare apathy > > and push the boulder and reach for the Blank Stone and submit the > following > > proposal and destroy the blank stone." > > > > Arguments against: AND says both/all or neither. > > Complicating factor: P9136 explicitly characterizes its attempted multiple > changes to rule 2691 as "a single amendment" > > -- > Mischief > Hat: steampunk hat > Vitality: Alive > Bang holdings: 1 > >
