On 7/13/24 11:25 PM, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
Cfj: the appended paragraph exists in the new rule. Arguments FOR: the previous judgement Janet referenced. I think it makes sense and applies (at least, the way Janet summarized the argument). Also, AND says do as much as is possible. Eg "I intend to declare apathy and push the boulder and reach for the Blank Stone and submit the following proposal and destroy the blank stone." Arguments against: AND says both/all or neither.
Complicating factor: P9136 explicitly characterizes its attempted multiple changes to rule 2691 as "a single amendment"
-- Mischief Hat: steampunk hat Vitality: Alive Bang holdings: 1
