On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 15:45 +0000, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: > On Mar 5, 2024, at 4:37 AM, Aris via agora-business > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > Erm... that CFJ doesn't do what you want it to. CFJs are supposed to be > > statements, not questions, and interpreting something out of context is > > different from interpreting it in context. > > Without commenting on the rest of the situation (I haven’t looked into > it), we have precedent that CFJs phrased as questions are fair game; see > CFJ 3505.
Well, the precedent of CFJ 3505 also states that CFJ 3505 was never validly judged, although the CFJ record seems to ignore that. (FWIW, I disagree and think that that part of the judgement was given validly, but is wrong.) -- ais523
