>From my recent in progress data analysis thesis, the y-intercept was
about -0.64 awards. I hope that this little "tutorial" can help with that,
and also help with "me new, what do" syndrome:
{
Herald Administrative Regulation MAZE
A player CAN award emself the Patent Title "Rookie", if that player
satisfies the following conditions:
1. E has flipped a switch twice.
2. E has created and destroyed an asset.
3. E has a ribbon.
4. E has no Patent Titles prior to awarding themself this patent title.
5. E has tabled an intent.
6. E has voted.
7. E, in the awarding message, cites all conditions they have fulfilled
other than this one.
}Thoughts, additions? Should 1 & 2 have the additional requirement of being "in a single message, E..."? Should the Patent title come under a different name? Murphy is thinking we should bring back ephemeral patent titles, so this patent title goes away after some condition is met? -- 4ˢᵗ Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
