On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:40 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Oh, oops, sorry. Reading is hard. > > If you're confidently saying that ais523's conditional vote should have > resolved to AGAINST, I can easily handle that. Thanks for untangling that. > > I do disagree about P8988. I'll call a CFJ in a little bit if nobody > else has. >
Yeah, makes sense. CFJs 4032 and 4043 taken together have resolved ais523's conditional vote, but that last step with 8988's adoption hasn't been tested/called. -G.
