On 6/20/23 17:48, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> I believe I won the rice game on 12 June - not sure though.  Here are
> my notes, wouldn't be at all surprised if I missed something critical.
>
> ---------------------------
> 5-22 harvested plan
> Created:  snail
> Up: {4st, beokirby, blob, inalienableWright, nix, snail, Yachay},
> Down: {Aspen, ais523, cuddlybanana, G., Janet, juan, Murphy}
> Signatures: snail, Yachay, 4st, beokirby
>
> After 5-22 harvest
> 4st           1
> beokirby      1
> blob          1
> iWright*      1
> nix           1
> snail         1
> Yachay        1
>
> ---------------------------
> 5-29 harvested plan
> Created: 2023-05-22 by juan
> Up: {Aspen, G., Janet, Murphy, ais523, cuddlybanana, juan}
> Down: {4st, beokirby, blob, iWright, nix, snail, Yachay}
> Signatures: ais523, juan, G., Janet
>
> After 5-29 harvest
> Aspen         1
> G.            1
> Janet         1
> Murphy        1
> ais523        1
> cuddlybanana  1
> Juan          1
>
> ---------------------------
> Note: ais523 had 1 rice at the time of Proposal 8989's alleged adoption
> (just before the 6-05 plans were harvested).  So that proposal was
> resolved incorrectly and the victory condition remains 2 rice.
>
> Proposal 8988 was adopted, but I'm assuming that plans and signatures
> were continuous as the definitions didn't change over-much, and the
> winning plan below was signed in a way (by announcement/announced
> consent) that works under both rule versions. This, of course, is
> arguable.
> ---------------------------
> 6-05 harvested plan
> Created: 2023-06-04 by 4st
> Up: {G.}
> Down: {All active players with 1 or more rice at the time of creation,
> except 4st}
> Signatures: G., 4st
> (note: G is on both up and down lists)
>
> After 6-05 harvest
> G.      1
>
> ---------------------------
> 6-12 harvested plan
> Created: 2023-06-05 by Beokirby
> Up: {Beokirby, Aspen, G., Janet, Murphy, ais523, cuddlybanana, juan}
> Down: {}
> Signatures: beokirby, juan
>
> After 6-12 harvest
> Beokirby      1
> Aspen         1
> G.            2
> Janet         1
> Murphy        1
> ais523        1
> cuddlybanana  1
> juan          1
> ---------------------------
>
> I did not track after this, due to not knowing if things were reset on 6-12


This doesn't appear to account for the two proposals that might have
affected this (or maybe they weren't in the relevant time period)?

I have no idea if disarmament passed, and I really don't have the energy
to untangle how the CFJs affected this myself.

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

Reply via email to