On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 11:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Now, it is sufficient to determine whether "that Rice Plan having that > > player's Signature" is an action or not. I'd say that it is a regulated > > action, fitting all three criteria for regulated actions: the rules have > > said how it occurs, whether it succeeds, and it affects gamestate the > > Ricemastor must track. > > > Again, it's not an action, it's a property or a state of affairs.
I disagree here. The judgement could wordsmith this critical point a bit better, but it's perfectly reasonable within the bounds of the rule text and common sense to say that going from "not having a signature" to "having a signature" is a change (an action) that happens with consent. -G.
