On 5/24/23 14:02, juan via agora-official wrote: > Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2023-05-24 06:46]: >>> + blob 2023-05-18 " cearguizoni1 at gmail dot com >> Oops we never resolved this. >> >> Claim of Error: Blob (as listed 4 times on the Registrar's Monthly >> report) is not a current player. >> >> blob (current): would you be willing to pick some kind of >> disambiguation of your nickname? > I deny this claim. > > blob is a current player. Or, rather, “blob” is the name of a > current player. As we have established this last week, a name is a name > if people are willing to use it. If the original blob were to come back, > we'd have to resolve this situation – but crucially, this is informal. > > As to the monthly report, where the two players appear in the same > context, I'll find a way to disambiguate it. For actions and reports in > the current context, we all know (and all shall know when looking upon > the archives) to which blob this refers. And, if someone publishes any > ambiguous reference to a “blob”, that that's just that: ambiguous. >
As Rulekeepor, I need some way to disambiguate in the FLR. I'm not going to do "blob (2)" or "blob (2023)", that's just ugly. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
