On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora- > > discussion wrote: > > > With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I believe that your > > > Officer salary problem is part of a larger problem of Agora overall > > > needing > > > a proper economy again, not a voting strength problem. > > > > So offer that as a package? In my experience, when things are taken > > away with the promise of new things to be added later, those things > > stay taken away, and the new things never arrive. > > I sometimes feel like half my arguing at Agora is dedicated to trying > to persuade people not to repeal the economy. > > It rarely works, and the consequence is that most of the time we don't > have a functional economy. (Having a history of the economy being > repealed is *also* a problem because it makes it harder to get a new > economy off the ground – why invest if you think that everything is > likely going to end up repealed again in the future?)
Define "works"? tbh, I mostly prefer the periods with no/very limited economies, because I like the various different subgames on their own, and whenever we have a "full" economy, then subgame wins become far too transactional and full of contracts/meta-subgame deals to be very playable as a standalone competition. -G.
