On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 2:08 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following two Proposals:
>
> Title: Democratization (low AI version)
> AI: 1
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
> /*Comment: I'm fine with rewarding officers and such with more voting
> power, but it seems obscene to me when certain players can have almost four
> (4!!!) times the voting power of a newbie. It's too greedy, too
> controlling, too much.
>
> Let's give everyone a more equal chance to be relevant.
>
> This is a low AI version. Amending the rule that gives players the default
> 3 Voting Strength would require a AI-3 Proposal, which seems difficult to
> pass or at least, it would be very easy to block.*/
>
> If the Proposal named "Democratization (high AI version)" is ADOPTED, then
> this Proposal does nothing. Otherwise:
>
> Create a new power-1 rule titled "Democratization" that says:
>
> {Each player has their voting strength increased by 5.}
>
Unfortunately, voting Strength is secured at power=2.
>
>
> Title: Democratization (high AI version)
> AI: 3
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
> /*Comment: I'm fine with rewarding officers and such with more voting
> power, but it seems obscene to me when certain players can have almost four
> (4!!!) times the voting power of a newbie. It's too greedy, too
> controlling, too much.
>
> Let's give everyone a more equal chance to be relevant.
>
> This is the high AI version. This is tidier, as it keeps it all in the same
> rule, but it would be harder to pass/easier to block because of its
> enormous AI requirement.*/
>
> If the Proposal named "Democratization (low AI version)" is ADOPTED, then
> this Proposal does nothing. Otherwise:
>
> Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2422 (Power 3) to read in full:
>
> {The voting strength of an entity on an Agoran decision is an integer
> between 0 and 15 inclusive, defined by rules of power 2 or greater. If not
> otherwise specified, the voting strength of an entity on an Agoran decision
> is 8.}
>
(Personally, I'd rather just split the difference with a power=2 rule than
to modify such a high power rule to do the same thing)
--
4st
Referee
Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
