On 4/18/23 13:57, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 4/18/23 13:16, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
Title: Delegation
AI: 3
Author: nix
Co-Author(s):
[This proposal adds Vacations and Delegation, which encourage officers
to take time off and give the responsibility to someone else for a
while. Not only is this intended to reduce burnout for officers, but it
is also intended to be an opportunity for other players to learn an
office without fully committing to it.]
Amend R2438 by replacing "Cyan (C): When a person deputises for an
office" with "Cyan (C): When a person deputises for an office or is
delegated an office"
Enact a new Power=3 rule titled "Vacations & Delegation" with the
following text:
An officer CAN and SHOULD take a Vacation from a specified office e
has continuously held for over 6 months with 14 day notice, if e has
not done so in the last year. When e does so, e can optionally
specify a player to be eir Delegate.
Actions with 14 days notice are impossible to perform, because the
resolution of the intent would have to come both after 14 days and
within 14 days of the intent being announced.
Good catch, fixed in to just 7.
An officer is On Vacation from a specified office if e has taken a
Vacation from that office in the last 30 days.
If an officer specified a Delegate when taking a Vacation, and the
Delegate has publicly consented, then the Delegate can act as if e
is the holder of the Office while the officer is On Vacation.
Should this be tracked somewhere (e.g. ADoP report)?
Probably.
Delegate should probably be a switch.
What property of switches does it need?
If a SHALL NOT or SHALL related to an Office is violated while an
Officer is on Vacation and e has specified a Delegate who has
consented, the Delegate is treated as the person that violated the
SHALL or SHALL NOT. If e has not specified a Delegate who has
consented, nobody is considered to have violated the SHALL or SHALL
NOT.
"Rules the the contrary notwithstanding, a delegate SHALL comply with
all duties of an office as if e held the office while the officer is On
Vacation, and officer NEED NOT comply with any duties of that office."
Yea that's cleaner.
Come to think of it, deputisation probably also needs a RttCN clause.
Also, we have an officer SHALL in Rule 2141, which this (and
deputisation) would be unable to override.
Hmm, would this need to be Power 3.3? or maybe add an exception to 2141.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
