Ah, no, " if e has not done so in the last year". Nevermind.

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:28 PM Yachay Wayllukuq <yachaywayllu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> You should probably make it a requirement to not be on Vacation in order
> to be able to "take a Vacation", because it might be possible to just spam
> Vacation-taking while already on Vacation to give out as many Cyan Ribbons
> as you want. Not sure though.
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:16 PM nix via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> Title: Delegation
>> AI: 3
>> Author: nix
>> Co-Author(s):
>>
>> [This proposal adds Vacations and Delegation, which encourage officers
>> to take time off and give the responsibility to someone else for a
>> while. Not only is this intended to reduce burnout for officers, but it
>> is also intended to be an opportunity for other players to learn an
>> office without fully committing to it.]
>>
>> Amend R2438 by replacing "Cyan (C): When a person deputises for an
>> office" with "Cyan (C): When a person deputises for an office or is
>> delegated an office"
>>
>> Enact a new Power=3 rule titled "Vacations & Delegation" with the
>> following text:
>>
>>      An officer CAN and SHOULD take a Vacation from a specified office e
>>      has continuously held for over 6 months with 14 day notice, if e has
>>      not done so in the last year. When e does so, e can optionally
>>      specify a player to be eir Delegate.
>>
>>      An officer is On Vacation from a specified office if e has taken a
>>      Vacation from that office in the last 30 days.
>>
>>      If an officer specified a Delegate when taking a Vacation, and the
>>      Delegate has publicly consented, then the Delegate can act as if e
>>      is the holder of the Office while the officer is On Vacation.
>>
>>      If a SHALL NOT or SHALL related to an Office is violated while an
>>      Officer is on Vacation and e has specified a Delegate who has
>>      consented, the Delegate is treated as the person that violated the
>>      SHALL or SHALL NOT. If e has not specified a Delegate who has
>>      consented, nobody is considered to have violated the SHALL or SHALL
>>      NOT.
>>
>> --
>> nix
>> Prime Minister, Herald
>>
>>

Reply via email to