On 1/23/2022 4:34 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, 2022-01-23 at 16:24 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: >> [Note: While the Arbitor's office has been vacant and I've been referee, >> I've been purposefully leaving a few days between my finger-pointing and >> deputisation to resolve finger-points, so anyone else can do it if they >> want, if it seems like too much self-interest]. > > Perhaps we should probably adjust Rule 2472 to place a SHALL NOT on > officers deputising for an incompatible office? (A CANNOT wouldn't > work, both for power reasons, and because there would be a workaround > of resigning your office and then deputising for it to get it back – > besides, the capability seems useful for recovering in an emergency.)
This isn't about incompatible offices exactly - for example if it were the referee that was vacant, anyone could do what I was doing without involving the arbitor. It's more about having an office lie empty that anyone can grab to do the fine-levying for fingers they themselves pointed. I was thinking the fix was adding a "you CANNOT resolve a finger that you yourself pointed, including through deputisation"? -G.
