On 7/12/21 5:13 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote: > I'm not sure your amendment does anything to help here. All it allows is > for different players to submit bids of equal amount as long as they're > on different lots in a selective-bid auction. The bids are still given > out to the Nth active bid, which is the part that is broken, at least to > my understanding.
Yes, that's the purpose of this. Two bidders should be able to have the same bid on different lots, so that bids aren't accidentally invalid (this happened in the giant stone auction a few months ago). I forgot about the other breakage; both things should be fixed. > > Also, the new paragraph could be construed as a universal prohibition > against submitting a bid amount that anyone has ever submitted before. > An "on that auction" or two in the new paragraph would probably cover that. Whoops. > ...actually, I just checked and the current regulation text fails to > specify this as well. Not sure if that changes anything at this point, > but we may as well fix that while we're here too. It's probably fine. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
