Gaelan wrote:
What would everybody think about substantially reducing the standard
required for finger-pointing--something along the lines of this: {
A player CAN by announcement Point eir Finger at a player (the perp),
specifying alleged violation of the rules or commission of a crime by
that person.
}
Then just make sure the Referee is required to specify the exact
crime/violated rule when resolving the decision.
The additional requirements were imposed to discourage cases where the
pointer specifies the action/inaction, but not which rule it violates,
and it's not obvious like in this case. Maybe just let the Referee
dismiss such cases at eir discretion, then the pointer can re-point with
the missing info added.
