On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 4:37 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
<agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 2021, at 9:15 AM, Falsifian via agora-business
> > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > I Point my Finger at myself for failing to publish a weekly report as
> > Editor of the Agoran Press contract for the week of April 19-25, 2021.
> >
> > Relevent text:
> >
> >> The Editor is the recordkeepor for Credits. The player Assigned to the
> >> previous week is the recordkeepor for Credits, or Falsifian if nobody is
> >> Assigned.
> >
> > --
> > Falsifian
>
> Wait, I'm not sure this is EFFECTIVE; it needs to cite a "specific rule or
> named crime", which I don't think it does. Unfortunately, I can't just
> clean this up myself, as if I point my finger, it becomes the Arbitor's
> problem.
>
> What would everybody think about substantially reducing the standard
> required for finger-pointing--something along the lines of this: {
> A player CAN by announcement Point eir Finger at a player (the perp),
> specifying alleged violation of the rules or commission of a crime by
> that person.
> }
> Then just make sure the Referee is required to specify the exact
> crime/violated rule when resolving the decision.
The idea seems good. You probably mean "specifying an alleged
violation". Also, I think at that point you could cut the bit about
the commission of a crime, since in general the commission of a crime
is a violation of a rule.
-Aris
