On 12/7/20 2:23 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > Is the intent that "fungible" must be defined by the rules explicitly > (e.g. "potatoes are fungible" being rules text) or that it's a sort of > judicial analysis (such that a judge would say "nothing in the rules > distinguishes one potato from any other potato therefore they're fungible")?
The latter. If there's no properties distinguishing them, they are fungible. > Say someday some rules text appears "if X, the player who received a > potato due to Y must destroy that potato." That sort of text would imply > that the potatoes were no longer fungible, and they'd stop being a currency? > Uhh... yes good point. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
