On 7/3/2020 5:09 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/3/2020 1:45 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
Even if it turns out
my arguments are terrible and it gets reconsidered, I'm glad I put the
effort into it.
At a first read, this looks comprehensive and well-done. Thanks for
putting in the substantial effort when you could have just stuck with your
original. I've got an honor debt to you for when I can next give honor.
Minor formatting thing: Do you mind if I mark the multi-line quoted
sections of your arguments with >'s when I put it in the archive?
Nope, go ahead.
Also on this bit:
The judge's definition of "buried" seems a bit odd to me.
In poking around the discussion at the time I now think e meant "buried"
in the strict sense of "part of a quoted section" (buried) versus "in a
break in the quoted section" (not buried). Not important at all but a
little less mysterious in that context!
Ah, that would make sense.
--
ATMunn
friendly neighborhood notary here :)
