On 7/3/2020 1:45 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote: > Even if it turns out > my arguments are terrible and it gets reconsidered, I'm glad I put the > effort into it.
At a first read, this looks comprehensive and well-done. Thanks for putting in the substantial effort when you could have just stuck with your original. I've got an honor debt to you for when I can next give honor. Minor formatting thing: Do you mind if I mark the multi-line quoted sections of your arguments with >'s when I put it in the archive? Also on this bit: > The judge's definition of "buried" seems a bit odd to me. In poking around the discussion at the time I now think e meant "buried" in the strict sense of "part of a quoted section" (buried) versus "in a break in the quoted section" (not buried). Not important at all but a little less mysterious in that context! -G.
