On 7/3/2020 8:14 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: > Maybe I'm misreading it, but I dug up the judgements for both of these > CFJs and it seems to me that neither attempt actually worked. > > On 7/2/2020 1:55 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: >> 3667 found that non-quotes buried in quotes worked. 3676 found that >> putting it actually *in* the quotes was a step too far. >> >> The 3667 attempt that worked: >> >> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-September/039218.html
Ooops - incomplete record. There were two judgements in 3667. The Evidence had been included entirely in quotes (with double-quoted sections), so in the first attempt I thought the whole message had been quoted and judged FALSE. Someone pointed out the original message didn't have the double-quotes, and after a Motion I judged TRUE. First judgement: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-October/039379.html Reconsideration: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-October/039380.html Final judgement: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-October/039409.html Full final arguments (by G.): > The announcement of intent is buried in quotes, but not in quotes. > We generally allow that sort of thing (actions with quotes on either > side) so it's not really less clear than other intents that have been > found to be successful lately. TRUE.
