On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 00:53, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 6/26/20 8:45 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote: > > This SHOULD only be done if the > > contract's provisions ensure that its funds will be used solely > > for the betterment of Agora. > > I think we should change this to: > This SHOULD only be done if the contract's provisions ensure that > the funds received from Agora will be used solely for the > betterment of Agora. > > Some contracts may receive both Agoran and private funds, and only the > Agoran funds should be restricted.
That's a good point. An alternative would be for such a contract to be split into two pieces, like when a corporation has a charitable foundation attached to it. I think that would be kind of fun so am inclined to leave the text as is, but could be persuaded to change it. - Falsifian
