true but you have to articulate a reasonable chain of reasoning for it to be plausible, not just have a gut feeling of unsureness or whatever. but i agree with you, it's probable that Jason didn't commit the crime, at least from the Rulekeepor angle. I'm not sure if it actually does fix a bug.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:09 AM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:06 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > plausible means something akin to "there is a colorable argument that it > is > > true". if you are convinced that there is a reasonable argument that it's > > related to the Rulekeepor's duties, that's probably enough. However, mere > > ambiguity or unsureness isn't. > > I find that a perfectly reasonable definition too. I'm not sure I see > the gap between "a colorable argument" and "ambiguity or unsureness". > If there isn't any colorable argument for something, I tend not to be > unsure of it. > > -Aris > -- >From R. Lee
