On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 16:48, nch <nchag...@protonmail.com> wrote: > On 6/12/20 11:42 AM, James Cook wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 22:12, nch <nchag...@protonmail.com> wrote: > >> On 6/11/20 2:28 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote: > >>> Actually, that could be a use for a limited asset. Call them Fingers, > >>> you pay one to point a finger, at most N Fingers exist at any given > >>> time, and they're gradually replenished somehow when there are fewer > >>> than N (auctions?). Not actually advocating for doing this now, but > >>> maybe if Referee load actually became an issue... > >> If anything this discourages pointing fingers, which feels like the > >> wrong direction. I'd rather punish people for too many shenanigans (like > >> I suggested in the Competitive Finger Pointing proto) than do this. > > Did you mean to reply to the list? Feel free to add the list back in > > if you like. > > > > I mostly agree. Just wondering what to do if contracts start to make > > heavy use of the Referee's time. Then it wouldn't necessarily be > > Shenanigans. Thinking about it more, that seems unlikely to happen. > > > > - Falsifian > > Oops, totally did mean to send this to list. Thanks for catching it.
Actually, I confused myself. I think you did reply to the list the first time. - Falsifian
