On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:12 PM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 2020-06-10 15:58, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 5:32 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business > > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:28 PM Reuben Staley via agora-business > >> <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2020-06-10 15:22, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I ossify Agora. > >>>> > >>> I point my Finger at G. for ossifying Agora. > >> > >> In case that wasn't sufficiently specific (give that G. did not > >> actually ossify Agora), I point my finger at G. for Engaging in > >> Forbidden Arts in the innermost message above. I further note that the > >> violation was both inconsequential and willful, so the Referee has > >> considerable discretion to weigh the relative impact of those two > >> factors. > >> > >> -Aris > > > > [snip] > > > > Trigon, given that G. is Arbitor, you will likely have to initiate the > > decisions, but G. will soon become Speaker, so that may not be your > > problem. > > Potential bug: I was reading through the high crimes rule and I found > this text: > > > Within 10 days but no less than 4 days after > > the indictment has been issued, the judge SHALL initiate two Agoran > > Decisions, one to determine whether to convict the perpetrator and > > one to determine whether to accept the indictment. > Is the judge actually authorized to initiate these decisions? I don't > see a relevant CAN in the rule. > > -- > Trigon
That does seem to be an issue, so here's a bug-solving proposal, which I will leave here for comments: Title: Indictment Fixes Adoption index: 1.0 Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Co-authors: Jason, Trigon Amend Rule 2619, "Indictment" by inserting "CAN and" prior to "SHALL initiate". Amend Rule 2619, "Indictment" by inserting ", by announcement," following "the investigator CAN".
