On 2020-06-10 15:58, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 5:32 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business
<agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:28 PM Reuben Staley via agora-business
<agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 2020-06-10 15:22, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
I ossify Agora.
I point my Finger at G. for ossifying Agora.
In case that wasn't sufficiently specific (give that G. did not
actually ossify Agora), I point my finger at G. for Engaging in
Forbidden Arts in the innermost message above. I further note that the
violation was both inconsequential and willful, so the Referee has
considerable discretion to weigh the relative impact of those two
factors.
-Aris
[snip]
Trigon, given that G. is Arbitor, you will likely have to initiate the
decisions, but G. will soon become Speaker, so that may not be your
problem.
Potential bug: I was reading through the high crimes rule and I found
this text:
Within 10 days but no less than 4 days after
the indictment has been issued, the judge SHALL initiate two Agoran
Decisions, one to determine whether to convict the perpetrator and
one to determine whether to accept the indictment.
Is the judge actually authorized to initiate these decisions? I don't
see a relevant CAN in the rule.
--
Trigon
