On 6/8/20 2:00 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > Here's another step towards solving the proposal rewards problem. Let > me know what you all think. > > -Aris > --- > Title: Interested Proposals Redux > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: Murphy, Ørjan, nch > > > [I know the overlap with office interest is a little confusing, but this > is traditional. If we have to change one, I'd prefer it be office interest.] > > Create a rule titled "Interested Proposals" with this text: > > Interestedness is an untracked proposal switch with values > "disinterested" and "interested" (default). The author of a > proposal CAN flip its Interestedness to disinterested > by announcement. > > Amend Rule 2496 (Rewards) by replacing this text: > * Being the author of an adopted proposal: > with this text: > * Being the author of a proposal that was interested when > adopted: > > If there is a rule entitled "Certifiable Patches", amend it by > appending to the first paragraph: > > When a proposal is pended by this method, it becomes disinterested.
This certainly seems to fix it, minus the issue someone else pointed out of someone flipping it to disinterested just to be mean. I'd vote for this but I think in the future we could redo the language around proposals to streamline this and pending and the exceptions to paying for pending. Right now it's starting to all look stapled together.
