On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:01 AM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Here's another step towards solving the proposal rewards problem. Let > me know what you all think. > > -Aris > --- > Title: Interested Proposals Redux > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: Murphy, Ørjan, nch > > > [I know the overlap with office interest is a little confusing, but this > is traditional. If we have to change one, I'd prefer it be office interest.] > > Create a rule titled "Interested Proposals" with this text: > > Interestedness is an untracked proposal switch with values > "disinterested" and "interested" (default). The author of a > proposal CAN flip its Interestedness to disinterested > by announcement. > > Amend Rule 2496 (Rewards) by replacing this text: > * Being the author of an adopted proposal: > with this text: > * Being the author of a proposal that was interested when > adopted: > > If there is a rule entitled "Certifiable Patches", amend it by > appending to the first paragraph: > > When a proposal is pended by this method, it becomes disinterested.
I like the idea, but my concern is that Certifiable Patches allows people other than the author to use it to pend, and I feel as if that would be unfair to the author unless there is some way for them to flip it back to interested, such as by paying the pending cost; however, to implement such a mechanism would increase the tracking load for those proposals because we would have to also track whether it had been paid.
