On 6/3/2020 2:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Aris may have a little more difficulty with eir proposal because that F/A > ratio doesn't have a clever term-of-art name defined in R955 - and I just > realized it's broken anyway, because the "greatest F/A ratio" doesn't > error trap division by 0 the way R955 does, even if it directly refers to > R955. > > (In terms of "greatest", for A=0 you might need an explicit tiebreaker - > level of F maybe? - that's not in the rules anywhere). >
Just a little more on this: the way we used to do it is to define "Voting Index" (VI) using the F/A ratio such that: If A>0 then VI = F/A; else if F=0 then VI=0; else VI = 'Unanimous' and we had additional text that said a proposal was ADOPTED if VI > AI, where 'unanimous' was considered greater than any AI. Still doesn't help with ties for A=0...
