On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:04 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:00 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 6/3/2020 1:46 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > > > On 6/3/20 4:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business > wrote: > > >> Replace the text "Rule 478" in Rule 2139, "The Registrar" with "the > > >> rule entitled "Fora"". > > >> > > >> Replace the text "Rule 1789" in Rule 2139, "The Registrar" with "the > > >> rule entitled "Cantus Cygneus"". > > > > > > > > > Honestly, it might just be better to nuke the last paragraph of that > > > rule - it doesn't really add anything. > > > > > > > Middle ground: recognize that both "publicity of a forum" and > > "Cantus/Writs" are well-defined terms of art so the "as described in..." > > clauses aren't needed at all. > > > > And here: > > > an action by a set of one or more dependent actions identified in > > > Rule 1728 > > > > R1728 starts: > > > The following methods of taking actions are known as "dependent > > > actions": > > > > so again, the term of art "dependent actions" is well-defined so the > > "identified in Rule 1728" is also wholly unneeded. > > > > So would this be better to just remove the references? > Yes. -Aris
