On Sunday, May 24, 2020 8:06:34 PM CDT you wrote:
> > On May 24, 2020, at 20:58, nch via agora-business
> > <[email protected]> wrote:> 
> > On Sunday, May 24, 2020 7:50:27 PM CDT you wrote:
> >>> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 5:42 PM nch via agora-business
> >>> 
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Ok, here's 1.3.
> >>> 
> >>> I cut out auctions completely because there are two proposals right now
> >>> to
> >>> fix them and I'd rather that dust settled first. I have a separate
> >>> proposal, based on Trigon's transmutation idea, coming later tonight.
> >>> That both adds a way to get Victory Points and helps us balance any card
> >>> types that might end up scarce.
> >>> 
> >>> I also reworked pending, based on G's comments. Now proposals go
> >>> straight
> >>> into the pool like they always did. There's a separate rule that adds a
> >>> Pend switch for them, and distribution requires proposals to have
> >>> Pend=True. The net effect is less direct changes to important rules, and
> >>> honestly a more intuitive system.
> >> 
> >> *groans*
> >> 
> >> Back to non-empty proposal pool reports I see. *sigh*
> >> 
> >> I may propose changing this at some point so that I only have to
> >> report pending proposals, but that's the sort of thing that can be
> >> dealt with later.
> >> 
> >> -Aris
> > 
> > Sorry Aris. On the plus side PSS did just point out a good tiny
> > adjustment. I withdraw Sets v1.3 and pledge not to submit any proposals
> > until after the next distribution.
> 
> If we’re putting this off until the next distribution, then I’ll provide
> some substantive thoughts on this matter. What if we made the author of a
> non-pending proposal responsible for its record-keeping but remove the
> responsibility to do so? That way the Promotor’s workload doesn’t increase,
> and excess proposals would self-ratify out of existence.

I guess when I was writing the rule I wasn't imagining it would be common to 
submit without pending (or knowing someone is likely to pend it). But if that 
does become common I definitely approve of any ideas to reduce Promotor 
overhead.

An even more aggressive solution would be to automatically remove unpended 
proposals from the pool when the Promotor does eir weekly duty. There's no 
cost to just submitting, so the worst case is people have to resubmit 
sometimes.

-- 
nch



Reply via email to