DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Sets v1.3

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion]

> On May 24, 2020, at 20:58, nch via agora-business 
> <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, May 24, 2020 7:50:27 PM CDT you wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 5:42 PM nch via agora-business
>>> 
>>> <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>> Ok, here's 1.3.
>>> 
>>> I cut out auctions completely because there are two proposals right now to
>>> fix them and I'd rather that dust settled first. I have a separate
>>> proposal, based on Trigon's transmutation idea, coming later tonight.
>>> That both adds a way to get Victory Points and helps us balance any card
>>> types that might end up scarce.
>>> 
>>> I also reworked pending, based on G's comments. Now proposals go straight
>>> into the pool like they always did. There's a separate rule that adds a
>>> Pend switch for them, and distribution requires proposals to have
>>> Pend=True. The net effect is less direct changes to important rules, and
>>> honestly a more intuitive system.
>> 
>> *groans*
>> 
>> Back to non-empty proposal pool reports I see. *sigh*
>> 
>> I may propose changing this at some point so that I only have to
>> report pending proposals, but that's the sort of thing that can be
>> dealt with later.
>> 
>> -Aris
> 
> Sorry Aris. On the plus side PSS did just point out a good tiny adjustment. I 
> withdraw Sets v1.3 and pledge not to submit any proposals until after the 
> next 
> distribution.

If we’re putting this off until the next distribution, then I’ll provide some 
substantive thoughts on this matter. What if we made the author of a 
non-pending proposal responsible for its record-keeping but remove the 
responsibility to do so? That way the Promotor’s workload doesn’t increase, and 
excess proposals would self-ratify out of existence.